The Foundation funds research into school outcomes, comparing proprietary career colleges to peer institutions.
The Foundation funds research into school outcomes, comparing proprietary career colleges to peer institutions.

Dr. Adem Ekmekci of Rice University has released a new report, Outcomes of Allied Healthcare Education in Texas, finding that allied health certificate and associate degree programs at Texas for-profit career colleges outperform similar programs at community colleges in the state.

Dr. Bruce Kellison and Dr. Matt Kammer-Kerwick of the Bureau of Business Research at The University of Texas at Austin have released a new report, Costs and Other Aspects of Nursing Education Models: A Multifactorial Comparison of For-Profit and Public/Nonprofit Training Programs, confirming that for-profit programs cost taxpayers roughly 50 percent less per student.

The new Lightcast report, Talent Shortages and Student Outcomes, confirms that for-profit institutions play a vital role in addressing skill gaps in high-demand fields while also delivering strong student outcomes, often outperforming public and nonprofit institutions in many areas.

Proposals should focus on postsecondary career education with a specific emphasis on proprietary career colleges and their associated costs, benefits, and relationship to workforce gaps and needs. We plan to support the publication of unbiased and credible research that shows how proprietary career college programs compare to similar programs in other sectors of higher education. This research will help the public and policymakers gain a better understanding of the work being done at various types of career colleges and how that work impacts students, taxpayers, and communities.